One should be sceptical of faux outrage

I attended Thomas Stocker’s lecture at Imperial. He was calm and measured, taking us through the determinations of the IPCC.

The IPCC now talks in terms of carbon budgets – how much CO2 we can emit before temperatures are 2C higher. Because CO2 remains in the atmosphere for hundreds of years this is pretty well a fixed number – 1000 Giga tonnes of carbon. We’ve already emitted most of that. To stay below  1000Gt, and thus below a 2C temperature increase, we need to reduce emissions. Yet, today, they’re increasing at 1.8% per annum.

The longer we wait to start reduction, the more aggressive we’ll have to be. And, if we do not decrease, we’re out of runway by mid-century; the rise will be more than 2C – with attendant more extreme weather variations, sea level rise, etc. More CO2 means higher temperatures.

This is not exactly mind-blowing stuff. The international goal is no more than a 2C rise. That means no more than 1000Gt of carbon. Carrying on as we are we blow the limit in a few decades. All Stocker is doing is pointing out the bleeding obvious, based upon the very conservative science of the IPCC.

But if you’re a so-called climate sceptic you decry the arithmetic as some bizarre form of activism. Eh?

This entry was posted in Climate. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to One should be sceptical of faux outrage

  1. Just to be clear, I moderate all comments. There are lots of places on the interweb for old men to conduct heated debates. This isn’t one of them. 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s